Thousands of organizations have been developed to save the world, but they don’t seem to be doing a very good job of it. Either they're doing it wrong, or they are doing it on purpose!
In the Name of Preparedness
There is a plethora of organizations around the world, formulated by individuals who have appointed themselves as our 'world leaders': WHO; WEF; IMF; UN; the World Bank; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; just to name a few.
Names like Rockefeller, Buffet, Schwab, Soros, Kissinger, Gates, and several others have been shaping our world for decades. They are all players in these organizations that are setting policy for how our world is run.
Do the People get a say in this? Mostly not. Apparently, our approval is not needed nor desired. They have all the money, power, and toys, and they have big plans for us. After all, they’re doing it for our own good.
These so-called philanthropists have been planning, predicting, and implementing pandemics and other terrorists acts for quite a while now, and the 'covid plandemic' has come very close to perfecting their outline. In the guise of preparing for future catastrophes, they actually lay out their plans by creating 'fictitious' scenarios they call Simulations or Tabletop Exercises. To practice their next moves, based on the success and failures of the previous program, they document and film the exercise, and the 'actors' in their theater are executives from all walks of life.
What the People of the world need to realize is that the whole covid scenario is the current iteration of an on-going plan to bring our world under utter control. The goal appears to be to terrorize the People on so many levels that fear is the predominant emotion, and compliance the only solution.
Rash words, you say? If you have been alive and paying attention at all for the past 40 years or so, you may have noticed the radical changes in our world that began in earnest in the '80s and have accelerated since the turn of the century. Our quality of life has deteriorated on almost every level and most people think this is normal. They blame the Left, or the Right, or Anyone who tries to point out the Truth of the matter. To consider the idea that our world leaders are actually the perpetrators is unthinkable.
Still have doubts? Here are some examples of their play-acting to project and perfect their plans.
Dark Winter – June 22, 2001
On June 22-23, 2001, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Bio-defense Studies, the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security, and the Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism, hosted a senior-level war game examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland. (See also: Article: Shining Light on Dark Winter)
The Dark Winter exercise portrayed a fictional scenario depicting a covert smallpox attack on US citizens. The scenario is set in 3 successive National Security Council meetings that take place over 2 weeks. The exercise was held at Andrews Air Force Base, Washington, DC. The Dark Winter script and other event materials are available through the conference web pages.
Atlantic Storm - January 14, 2005
Atlantic Storm was a ministerial Tabletop Exercise convened by the Center for Biosecurity, the Center for Transatlantic Relations of the Johns Hopkins University, and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network. The exercise used a fictitious scenario designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bio-terrorist attack.
The interactive presentation brings the event to life as you watch the news, learn the facts, read the briefings, and listen to excerpts of the players' discussions--from the ringside perspective of an observer, or from the hot seat perspective of a world leader facing a global outbreak of a deadly infectious disease.
The event website provides a comprehensive overview of the exercise and access to all materials and multimedia, including a BBC Newsnight Video, and the after-action report, Navigating the Storm.
Clade-X – May 15, 2018
The John Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted another pandemic Tabletop Exercise in Washington, D.C. in May 2018. Clade-X is a day-long exercise that simulated a series of National Security Council convened meetings of ten US government leaders, played by individuals prominent in the fields of national security or epidemic response.
Faced with a rapidly evolving biological threat landscape, government leaders in the United States and abroad are eager to identify long-term policy commitments that will strengthen preparedness and mitigate risk. Clade X illustrated high-level strategic decisions and policies needed to prevent a severe pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail.
The 'Event 201' took place a few months before the first rumors of a renegade corona virus hit the streets. The comparison of what the exercise proposed and the actual events is uncanny. There is a double edge to these exercises. In the name of preparation, the game learns what can be done to actually safeguard the public and where the vulnerabilities lie. Once the game is played, the most important take-away is where the vulnerabilities lie.
Event 201 - October 18, 2019
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences. Pandemic Exercise Highlights Reel
Event 201, played by fifteen leaders of business, government, and public health, will illustrate realistic policy problems that must be addressed under pressure during a pandemic. At the video-driven exercise, players will be presented with a scenario that reveals unresolved and controversial policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention.
“Outbreaks of infectious disease are inevitable, but the economic damage they cause is not,” said Ryan Morhard, project lead for Global Health Security at the World Economic Forum. “Sustained attention from a broad multi-stakeholder coalition is needed in advance of a severe pandemic to save lives and minimize economic and societal consequences.”
One of the questions posed by a 'player' was,
"How should anti-viral and medical supplies be distributed to those who need them most?"
Most of us are aware of the fact that the powers-that-wanna-be put the kibosh on Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine early on, even though many doctors were having excellent results with those who were sick. One doctor, Paul Marik, told how he was actually made to stand down and had to watch his patients die, when they could have been saved. In rating the success of these 'exercises', based on this point alone, they are an obvious FAILURE.
The CHS 'CYA' Statement
BTW - The Center for Health Security added a little side-note to their Event 201 page, apparently due to questions arising about the 'coincidental likenesses' of the Event 201 Exercise and the real events of the C-19 pandemic. CHS wants to assure us that they were not 'predicting' a pandemic, nor millions of deaths. They were just playing like there was one in the name of preparedness, as they state quite clearly here in their 'CYA Statement' [cover your ass]. It was all quite coincidental - Really!
Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats
SUMMARY
In March 2021, NTI partnered with the Munich Security Conference to conduct a tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats. The exercise examined gaps in national and international bio-security and pandemic preparedness architectures—exploring opportunities to improve prevention and response capabilities for high-consequence biological events... The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of Monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.
Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate bio-safety and bio-security provisions and weak oversight. By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.
FORWARD
Over the past two years, the world has faced the devastating impact that a biological event can have on human health, economies, and political stability. As of this writing, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected more than 250 million people, killed more than five million, and caused trillions of dollars in economic losses. COVID-19 has revealed that national governments and the international community are woefully unprepared to respond to pandemics—underscoring our shared vulnerability to future catastrophic biological threats that could meet or exceed the severe consequences of the current pandemic.
Although national and global leaders are appropriately focused on the immediate demands of the COVID-19 response, the international community cannot postpone implementing the steps necessary to protect against future biological threats. This must include the recognition that while naturally emerging pandemics continue to pose a significant threat, the next global catastrophe could be caused by the deliberate misuse of the tools of modern biology or by a laboratory accident. Fundamentally, strengthening the preparedness of every nation to meet these challenges is a humanitarian imperative in the collective self-interest of the international community. Even the most prepared nations will remain vulnerable as long as significant bio-security and pandemic preparedness gaps remain in countries around the world. We are only as safe as our weakest link.
To strengthen international capabilities to respond to the next pandemic, national and global leaders must build stronger public health and medical response capabilities that can scale to address very high-consequence biological events—potentially orders of magnitude more severe than what we have experienced during the past two years. We cannot afford to be reactive. We must build our public health and medical systems to be anticipatory, responding energetically and proactively in the face of uncertainty—taking what humanitarian and crisis response communities describe as a 'No Regrets' approach.
The 'No-regrets' approach are actions by households, communities, and local/national/international institutions that can be justified from economic, and social, and environmental perspectives, whether natural hazard events or climate change (or other hazards) take place or not. 'No-regrets' actions increase resilience, which is the ability of a 'system' to deal with different types of hazards in a timely, efficient, and equitable manner. Increasing resilience is the basis for sustainable growth in a world of multiple hazards. (see Heltberg, Siegel, Jorgensen, 2009; UNDP, 2010)
Translation - They will have no regrets doing whatever they deem necessary or desirable to achieve their ends, but quite likely the rest of the world will - especially the poorest among us.
In hard times, sacrifices must be made. Try to remember, 'It's for your safety - and the good of the whole'.
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
The extraordinary group of participants consisted of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany, as well as Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The exercise simulated a series of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic set in the near future. Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.
Participants were challenged to make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of uncertainty. Each problem and choice had serious health, economic, and social ramifications.
The verbiage used by these so-called philanthropists and world leaders is of great importance. Their device is the appearance of benevolence, but their actions and results reveal them. Their words are a carefully designed facade to hide their true intent.
One of the larger purposes for the events these organizations orchestrate, is data mining. In the guise of helping the world with the 'horrific problems' that are 'out there', they get to ascertain where the weakest links are in society, how they can capitalize on them and ultimately, control or eliminate them.
Throughout all the discussions about 'pandemic preparedness'; with all the organizations created to handle such things - many thousands of them world-wide - the best the lot of them have been able to come up with is to 'vaccinate' every soul on the planet. They have spent billions, perhaps trillions, of dollars on the facade of stopping a virus that supposedly constantly mutates and of which, it can never be known where it will show up and in what form.
The other aspect to their mitigation is to create more surveillance, less freedoms, and even more organizations to oversee all their grand plans. Would it not be more effective to spend that money on infrastructure, sanitation, and nutrition? The lack of these has been proven historically to be the cause of all 'disease'.
Their thousands of organizations claim to be all about these efforts to feed and house people, but the reality is the constant wholesale degradation and destruction of individuals, societies, infrastructure, eco-cultures, agriculture, and everything connected. There is no need to create thousands of organizations to mitigate destruction when you stop destroying things.
Recommendation - Focus on Peace and Prosperity instead of creating Diseases and Death. Simple!