NTI, Nuclear Threat Initiative and WEF, World Economic Forum have a plan to make sure that no one but them and their appointees will have control of DNA synthesis, and that screening programs should be developed and implemented world-wide. According to NTI, "We're in a race between cooperation and catastrophe." and the public does not need to understand what these organizations are doing to benefit from it. The public does, however, need to cooperate. Both organizations also have built-in programs to groom the next generation into their scientific notions. After all, they are 'securing our future'.
In a paper titled, 'A Collaboration between NTI and the WEF - Insight Report - Biosecurity Innovation and Risk Reduction: A Global Framework for Accessible, Safe and Secure DNA Synthesis', these organizations have it all mapped out on how they alone will be in control of world-wide DNA Synthesis to safe-guard the science against any other evil-doers out there with bad intentions.
According to this proposed collaboration -
DNA screening will be an important safeguard against the accidental or deliberate misuse of pathogen and toxin DNA as access to synthetic DNA rapidly expands.
They are proposing to allocate funding immediately [which they most likely already have] to design DNA screening mechanisms which are uniformly programmed to accept specific sequencing and reject others. NTI and WEF are proposing a new organization be established specifically to oversee this program and all will be overseen by them.
Once all the appropriate DNA manipulators around the world are mandated to use these mechanisms, the world will be a 'safer place', since no one will be able to sequence DNA except as they are authorized – in theory.
One would first have to wonder what is so important about DNA synthesis that it must be done, and if it’s so dangerous, why is anyone doing it?
Well – Because Science!
From page 12 of their proposed collaboration -
Finally, international organizations should actively promote the norm for synthetic DNA screening by driving recognition and adoption of the common DNA sequence screening mechanism. For example: Leadership from relevant international organizations, such as the United Nations, WHO, World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), International Organization for Standardization, World Intellectual Property Organization, and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, joining efforts with the World Economic Forum, should raise awareness, disseminate guidance, and incentivize use of the common DNA sequence screening mechanism.
Development of the common DNA sequence screening mechanism will expand beyond the current system for synthetic DNA screening practices. Partners, sponsors, and supporters at every level will help ensure that screening practices become an established global norm. DNA screening will be an important safeguard against the accidental or deliberate misuse of pathogen and toxin DNA as access to synthetic DNA rapidly expands and bench top machines become a reality.
WEF, along with other select groups would like to take over the management of pretty much everything in our world, and largely already have. They are doing this because they 'care so much about humanity'. They say so right there on their website! They are the experts, they know what's 'best' for us. If it means some 'minor loss' of our freedoms and the surveillance of the very air we breathe, surely if will be worth it to secure our safety.
These same people want every single man, woman, child, and beast to be vaccinated, everything we eat to be genetically modified, and every individual who doesn’t fit their mold to be eliminated. Whether we ask them to or not, they intend to lay down the outline of our lives and the policies of the world.
Also, in their future, you will own nothing and be happy. They plan to make sure of it.
'The next deadly pathogen could come from a rogue scientist. Here’s how we can prevent that.'
Kelsey writes,
In the past few years, something new has become possible in biology: cheaply 'printing' DNA for insertion into a cell...But as is often the case when a scientific field gets a lot better at what it does very quickly, progress in DNA synthesis has been so fast that coordination against bad actors has lagged.
As a private individual, I can send a DNA sequence I’d like synthesized to dozens of labs around the world that can print it out and send it to me.... a few DNA synthesis companies will send me what I ask for, with no screening to check whether they’re sending out a pathogen that ought to be carefully controlled. Synthetic DNA is not a live virus, of course; I’d have to be a talented biologist with specialized knowledge, lots of resources, and access to expensive tools to use it maliciously.
James Diggans, who works on biosecurity at the industry-leading organization, Twist Bioscience, told Kelsey,
DNA[synthesis] is an inherently dual-use technology. What that means is DNA synthesis makes fundamental biology research and lifesaving drug development go faster, but it can also be used to do research that can be potentially deadly for humanity. That’s the problem that biosecurity researchers — in industry, in academia, and in the government — are faced with today: trying to figure out how to make DNA synthesis faster and cheaper for its many beneficial uses, while ensuring every printed sequence is screened and hazards are appropriately handled.
Diggans suggests,
Make grants for biologists who do research with DNA synthesis contingent on using labs that follow screening guidelines. Most of the grants for DNA research actually comes from the US government. By mandating that scientists only buy their DNA from organizations that are employing state-of-the-art, agreed-upon screening procedures — otherwise they don’t get the grant — we can turn DNA screening from a competitive disadvantage into a competitive advantage, and hopefully drive more labs to get on board.
If you really want to get your Science on, you can order just about anything you need from Twist Bioscience. Genes; RNA; DNA; SARS-CoV-2 Tools - They got it!
So - the US Government is providing most of the funding for DNA synthesis; NTI and WEF are offering to step up to establish regulations; experts like James Diggans have assured us that there are those out there who will do evil things just because they can; and all are agreed that everything should be uniformly regulated to reduce the risk of some 'bad actor doing bad things'.
We all know that only the good guys comply, so it would seem that no matter how carefully we try to control these things, they will likely, ultimately be compromised at some point.
The fact is, DNA synthesis is dangerous to humanity but scientific curiosity knows no bounds. It might be wise to consider the old saying, 'Just because we can doesn't mean we should.' Now that the genie is out of the bottle, so to speak, how shall we prevail?
Here's an idea -
What if, in the interest of 'safety for All', DNA synthesis, gene editing/slicing/dicing/mutation, and everything else in that realm were outlawed forever, along with eliminating 99% of the chemicals and pharmaceuticals that are being manufactured?
Instead, we focus full bore on enhancing humans, animals, plants, and the rest of the world with nothing but natural methods – Extreme Health; Sustainable Agriculture and Permaculture; Bio and other Natural Fuels; Hemp Creations; Mushroom Leathers; Bio-Char; and thousands of other methods that are tried and true.
If we would put as much effort into these things as we do into all the 'mad science', we could transform our lives. Perhaps then our world would be a 'Safe' place to live in.